News

01.07.2025

  • The Primorsky District Court of St Petersburg has jailed St Petersburg State University lecturer Mikhail Suvorov for 10 days over a pro-Ukrainian social media post from three years ago, reports “Rotonda.”

    His phone was also confiscated. Suvorov is a professor in the Department of Arabic Studies at the Faculty of Oriental Studies, St Petersburg State University. In March 2022, he published a post on VKontakte with a slogan in support of Ukraine. He was charged under an administrative article for displaying extremist symbols (Article 20.3 of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences).

    In court, Suvorov expressed remorse, explaining that he had made the post for his Ukrainian friends and had forgotten to delete it.

    2 July The management of St Petersburg State University launched an internal investigation in connection with Mikhail Suvorov’s administrative arrest. The university stated that the lecturer had submitted a resignation letter.

    According to TASS, in addition to posting the slogan “Glory to Ukraine,” Suvorov’s page also featured symbols associated with the “Freedom of Russia Legion,” which is banned in Russia.

30.06.2025

27.06.2025

26.06.2025

  • 12:42

    A resident of Perm, a major city in the Urals, was fined twice in one day under charges of “discrediting the army” (Article 20.3.3, Part 1 of the Administrative Offences Code) because of anti-war comments. This was reported by the outlet Idel.Realii.

    The Industrial District Court of Perm handed the man two fines of 30,000 roubles each (approx. US$320). Both decisions were issued on 18 April.

    One protocol was drawn up over comments made in the “ChP Perm | Perm Krai” public group below a 2023 post about the deaths of two Russians in the war, including a member of the Wagner Group. The Perm resident left several comments:

    —“I disagree. Russia invaded another country and is killing Slavs. Firstly, he was a mercenary, he killed for money. Can you explain to me: if someone kills people for money in another country, can they really be considered a hero in their own country?”;

    —“These are mercenaries from Russia who kill for money, our taxes. They are killers. And Ukrainian troops eliminate such Wagnerites”;

    —“Eliminated as a mercenary who killed people for money”;

    —“For killing people for money—eternal memory?”;

    —“Who will mourn the Ukrainians who were killed by mercenaries for money?”;

    —“How can mercenaries who killed for money be called heroes?.”

    In his explanation to the police, the Perm resident stated that he considers his statements lawful, as the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech.

    The second protocol arose from his comment on a post beginning with the words: “The Ministry of Defence spoke of the heroism of Russian Armed Forces soldiers in the special military operation zone.” The Perm resident wrote: “He kills people for money in a foreign country. And they call him a hero.” This time, the man was present at the hearing. He did not admit guilt and said that his statement referred only to one person, with no intent to discredit the armed forces. He added that he in fact has a positive attitude toward the Russian army and has relatives who serve as military personnel.

    “[The defendant] believes that the authorities began to persecute him after he removed a poster calling for participation in the special military operation for a high reward,”—the court’s ruling summarised the man’s testimony.

    Because of the poster incident, the Perm resident was already prosecuted in February 2025. According to a court decision obtained by OVD-Info, at that time he was fined another 30,000 roubles (approx. US$320) under the same “discrediting” article. The ruling states that the man tore down a banner advertising contract military service from a school fence. He was spotted and detained by a security guard, and police were called to the scene. The Perm resident explained then that he tore down the poster “so that young people would not participate in the special military operation, because he didn’t want them to die; he is against the special military operation.”

24.06.2025

21.06.2025

20.06.2025

19.06.2025

18.06.2025

  • 20:48

    Roskomnadzor has blocked Wattpad, the popular platform for stories and fanfiction, in Russia. TASS reports, citing the agency.

    The decision to block the site was made “due to the systematic disregard of requirements to remove prohibited information,” including posts officials claimed contained “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations.”

    The agency added that at the time of the block, Wattpad had not removed 130 pages with prohibited content, contrary to the authorities’ demands. In addition, the platform owner has been fined three times, for a total of more than 5 million roubles (about US$55,000), which have yet to be paid.

    Wattpad is a popular platform for writers and fanfiction authors.

  • 17:27

    Former municipal deputy from Yefremov, Tula region, Olga Podolskaya, has been fined 10,000 roubles (approx. US$110) under the article on participation in the activities of an undesirable organisation (Art. 20.33 of the Administrative Offences Code). This was reported by the joint press service of the Tula region courts.

    The Yefremov Interdistrict Court of the Tula region found Podolskaya guilty due to her participation in videos published on the Telegram channel “Deputies of Peaceful Russia.” This is an association of municipal and regional deputies who oppose the war with Ukraine and are living in forced exile. In August 2024, the Prosecutor General’s Office added the organisation to the list of “undesirable” groups.

    Previously, Olga Podolskaya was fined for publishing information without the “foreign agent” disclaimer. She was added to the Ministry of Justice’s register in September 2023. Podolskaya helped Alexei Moskalyov, who was convicted in a criminal case for “discrediting the Russian Armed Forces,” and his daughter.

  • The Rampa Theatre in Nakhodka (a major city in Primorsky Krai, Russian Far East) cancelled its anti-fascist musical “Cabaret” due to “reasons beyond its control.” As reported by journalist Anna Sharipova, the local authorities banned the performance. This was noted by “7×7.”

    According to Sharipova, Rampa’s director Andrei Yurchenko had planned to hold one closed performance “for friends.” In the end, the actors were not able to perform, and Yurchenko announced that “they have been banned from staging the play on this stage.”

    “It’s said that the deputy head [of Nakhodka, Natalya Agritskaya] attended the dress rehearsal. She saw a lot of people in Nazi uniforms, women in stockings, practically orgies. But that’s just hearsay. The idea is that she was scared someone from the audience would film it and then Nakhodka would make headlines across Russia, that the municipal Youth Centre is showing Nazis and debauchery,” Sharipova told “7×7.”

    The journalist noted that Rampa is an amateur theatre without its own venue. The actors perform at the municipal Youth Centre, where they also receive their salaries.

    A “7×7” source at the theatre confirmed that the musical was cancelled at the request of the Nakhodka administration. According to them, officials even banned the performance for friends, “hinting at consequences in a more damaging form.”

    “We’d been working on the show for a year. Costume and set sketches had been created and approved, and the orchestra had learned all the parts for the musical. Then, two weeks before the premiere, officials from the administration came and banned ticket sales (even though sales had already started). <…> The officials just respond in vague terms, saying it’s ‘inappropriate,’ and that’s it,” the source said.

  • Maria Makhmutova, a resident of Irkutsk region in Siberia, has been issued a protocol for “discrediting the army” (Article 20.3.3 of the Administrative Code) after criticising Russia Day and participants in the war, according to the regional Interior Ministry department. reports.

    Earlier, she wrote on VKontakte that officials had decided not to draw up a protocol or open a criminal case against her: “No drugs, no alcohol, no psych ward, no remand facility, no admin charges, no criminal charges. When I know my rights even without lawyers. Info for those who were quick to celebrate,” Makhmutova said. Her page is now closed.

    The Interior Ministry said the protocol was actually drawn up against her on 13 June. The case will be heard by the Kirovsky District Court in Irkutsk.

    The ministry also reported that the day before, the woman left a specialised medical institution. On 17 June, RT, citing a law enforcement source, reported that Makhmutova had been sent to a psychiatric-neurological hospital.

    “At present, law enforcement agencies are continuing a comprehensive investigation. Her actions are being assessed both from the perspective of criminal and administrative law,” added the Interior Ministry. On 13 June, the Investigative Committee reported that she was also being checked under the criminal article on “discrediting the army” (Article 280.3 of the Criminal Code).

    On 12 June, Makhmutova posted a video on her Instagram page, which has more than five thousand followers, criticising celebrations of Russia Day and condemning participants in the war in Ukraine:

    “What kind of holiday is this, fuck? An amazing holiday—Russia Day. And what, are you proud of something or what? What are you proud of, fuck? That you live with almost nothing to your name? That you have to kill people so you can buy yourself cars and flats, fuck, and drink like it’s your last day, and wear those fucking medals. Your medals today are a mark for life, a brand for life, that you’re fucking murderers. <…> If all the ‘special operation’ guys die tomorrow, I’ll drink some wine.”

    After this, activists from the pro-government “People’s Call” movement reported her to the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor General’s Office. Makhmutova soon posted an apology video, saying she was not ready to lose her child, crying, and trying to cut her wrists.

    On 13 June, security officials came to her home. She refused to open the door and threatened to harm herself. In the end, Emergency Ministry employees forced open the door and detained Makhmutova. According to the security officials, on the way to the police station she tried to run away several times. After her detention, when a female investigator asked whether she was ready to apologise, the woman replied: “No, I’ve got nothing to apologise for.”

  • In Kemerovo region, a court fined a resident of Kiselevsk 10,000 roubles (approx. US$115) under the offence of inciting hatred (Article 20.3.1 of the Administrative Offences Code) for negative comments about police officers on VKontakte. This was reported by the “Kuzbass Without Extremism” Telegram channel, which is linked to law enforcement authorities.

    The channel published one of the comments that triggered the fine: “Our f***ing police know only how to lock people up for games! That’s it! They’re good for nothing else! A bastard country with bastard laws, courts, and police! And the bunker-dweller is the same.”

    The same court fined the man an additional 30,000 roubles (approx. US$345) under the offence of calling for sanctions against Russia (Article 20.3.4 of the Administrative Offences Code). In this instance, the protocol was issued because of his comment under news about US President Joe Biden’s team considering Russia one of the main threats to the United States. “For f**k’s sake, just recognise it already!!!!!!! Impose sanctions!!!!!! Come on Biden, please!!!!!!” the man wrote.

    The court issued both decisions on 17 June.

17.06.2025

  • For “inciting hatred” against “Russian colonisers,” 65-year-old Magni­togorsk resident Zilya Ramazanova has been fined 10,000 roubles (US$110). The decision of the Leninsky district court, dated 29 April this year, was noted by the SOVA analytical centre.

    The court claims that in February this year, the woman posted the following comment in the “Slavic People” community on VKontakte: “Russian colonisers, when seizing the lands of indigenous non-Russian peoples, also raped, killed, burned people alive. Fascists.” The court ruled that this was “a negative judgement against a group of people united by race, nationality, and the descriptor ‘Russian colonisers.’”

    In court, the woman pleaded guilty and confirmed that she had posted the comment. She stated that she “intended to draw attention to historical facts that happened in the past.”

    The court fined Ramazanova under the article for inciting hatred or enmity (Article 20.3.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences). She has filed an appeal against the court’s decision.

16.06.2025

15.06.2025

12.06.2025

11.06.2025

  • 18:55

    The online cinema service “Ivi” has removed the film “The Collapse of the World,” in which the plot involves Vladimir Putin dying. This was reported by film critic Timur Aliyev and noted by SOTA.

    “It’s a shame, of course. It was the only way to legally access the original audio track, rather than watching the dubbed version,” Aliyev commented.

    “Ivi” was the only major Russian streaming platform that had not censored the scene featuring a news broadcast about a new fever, SOTA observes. The episode shows footage from Russia, and behind the news anchor the hashtag #PutinDead and the headline “What has happened to Putin?” are visible.

  • 16:57

    A protocol for “discrediting” the Russian army (part 1 of article 20.3.3 of the Administrative Offences Code) has been drawn up against Eduard Goida, a Moscow resident. The channel “Ostorozhno, novosti” (“Caution, news”) reported this.

    Exactly what the 58-year-old engineer is accused of remains unknown. A hearing for his case has been scheduled for late June at the Tushinsky District Court in Moscow.

    Speaking to a journalist, the man said that the protocol was prompted by a “conversation on the street.” However, he did not specify what the conversation was about and declined to provide details of the case until the court hearing.

  • In Kemerovo region, a resident of Anzhero-Sudzhensk, a city in Siberia, has been fined 10,000 roubles (approx. US$110) over a comment about Russian soldiers. This was reported by the Telegram channel “Kuzbass Without Extremism,” which is linked to law enforcement.

    The man was found guilty of inciting hatred (Article 20.3.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences).

    “In Sergey’s comments, law enforcement identified statements which negatively assessed a group of people united by their belonging to the servicemembers of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation,” the channel wrote.

    They did not quote the statement that led to the charges, but published a screenshot of Sergey’s comment: “Well, it’s only right—Shoigu’s looters are dropping like flies.”

    On 7 June, “Kuzbass Without Extremism” reported that the same man had also been fined 15,000 roubles (approx. US$165) under the article on “discrediting the army” (Article 20.3.3 of the Code of Administrative Offences).

    “[Sergey], in one of the social networks, made negative remarks in comments on various posts regarding the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, calling participants in the special military operation ‘fascists,’ ‘fertiliser,’ and ‘cannon fodder,’” the channel wrote.

  • Rosaliya Kozlovskaya, head of school No. 12 in Kazan, was fined 170,000 rubles (about US$1,900) under an army ‘discreditation’ protocol (Part 1, Article 20.3… of the Administrative Offences Code) because of a link to the website of the Jewish Agency for Israel (“Sokhnut”).

    The decision was made back in April, but the court ruling was only published on 10 June. The media outlet “Idel.Realii” reported this.

    According to the court ruling, a link to the “Heftsiba” educational programme on the Sokhnut agency’s website, which works on repatriation to Israel, was posted on the website of School No. 12, which people in Kazan call the “Jewish school.” The link led to the Russian-language version of the site.

    Prosecutors drew up the protocol against Kozlovskaya because the English-language version of the site had a “Help Jews in Ukraine” section about assistance for Jews in Ukraine, which mentioned the war and ways to help people in Ukraine.

    The prosecution considered the following passages to constitute army discreditation:

    “Russia attacked several Ukrainian cities from the air and Russian ground troops entered Ukraine from several directions. The war is ongoing, with hundreds of civilians killed and millions fleeing for their lives. From the start of the war, the Jewish Agency has been on the front line, saving Jews from Ukraine, with staff on the ground, many of whom are risking their lives to rescue the Jewish national community.”

    “While the war continues, the Jews of Ukraine are desperately in need of our help. The Jewish Agency is working on the ground to help Ukrainian Jews who wish to quickly and safely make aliyah to Israel, as well as supporting and protecting members of the local Ukrainian Jewish community who have chosen to stay. But we need your support. Donate today; every dollar helps Ukrainian Jews in this unimaginable crisis.”

    Discreditation was also found in a video featuring Ukrainian refugees (spelling as in the court’s ruling): “We lived in Kyiv before the war and worked… And now for the second time we are fleeing from the Russian war… We travelled for more than 2 weeks trying to find a place because all cities were taking in people from central and eastern Ukraine. We slept in the bathroom or in the corridor… For the first time we were able to sleep well, you know, not wandering anywhere, not hearing any sirens.”

    Kozlovskaya did not admit guilt. She said she had not posted these materials, and pointed out that the content in question was in other sections and in the English-language version of the website. Judge Artur Kiselev judged this argument “untenable.”

    The same link also became the basis for a second protocol against the school’s director, accusing her of inciting hatred (Article 20.3.1 of the Administrative Offences Code), and she was fined 17,000 rubles (about US$190). The ruling quotes an expert’s opinion that the same passages show “certain indirect linguistic signs of inciting enmity” towards Russians.

    Kozlovskaya has appealed both rulings. The appeal is scheduled to be heard on 25 June.

    The link that triggered the prosecution was posted in the “International Cooperation” section. That section is now empty on the school website.

  • 14:43

    The Butyrsky District Court in Moscow fined student Arina Kalita 30,000 roubles (approximately US$330) under the article on “discrediting the army” (Part 1, Article 20.3.3 of the Administrative Offences Code). This was reported by the press service of Moscow’s courts of general jurisdiction, and the ruling is available on the court’s website.

    Kalita is a third-year student at the MPGU college, specialising as a primary school teacher. In December 2024, she had an argument with a fellow student in their group chat on VKontakte called “Friendly Armenians 32u.” Kalita wrote a message about “a young man who is currently in the area of the special military operation.” Her classmate replied that “the FSB is very good at dealing with such statements about the military.” The classmate later published screenshots of their conversation.

    Kalita stated that she was joking and had “apologised” to the young man she mentioned in the messages.

  • An “man in women’s clothing” from Yakutsk (a city in Russia’s Far East) has been fined 50,000 rubles (approximately US$560) under the “LGBT propaganda” law (part 1 of article 6.21 of the Code of Administrative Offences). This was reported by the local Interior Ministry.

    According to law enforcement, the “offender, while intoxicated, applied makeup in a demonstrative manner, used foul language, harassed passersby and behaved provocatively in public places.” As a result, they also drew up reports under the articles on minor hooliganism (part 1 of article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences) and being drunk in public (article 20.21).

  • 10:33

    A protocol has been drawn up against the Moscow bookshop Falanster for alleged “LGBT propaganda” (Part 1, Article 6.21 of the Code of Administrative Offences). This was reported by Mediazona, which found the case record on the website of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow.

    The reason for the protocol is unknown. Under this article, legal entities face a fine of between 800,000 and one million roubles (approximately US$8,900 to US$11,100) or administrative suspension of activities for up to 90 days.

    In addition, Mediazona discovered that the court has registered a new protocol under the article on participation in the activities of an “undesirable organisation” (Article 20.33 of the Code of Administrative Offences) against Boris Kupriyanov, a co-founder of Falanster.

    Both cases will be heard in the morning on 18 July.

    At the end of May, the court already imposed fines on both the bookshop and Kupriyanov under protocols on “undesirable organisations.” Falanster was fined 80,000 roubles (about US$900), and its co-founder was fined 40,000 roubles (about US$450).

    The case concerned a book by anarchist and political prisoner from Belarus, Ihar Alinevich, about his time in the KGB pre-trial detention centre in Minsk. Security officials decided it was published with support from the “Anarchist Black Cross Federation,” which has been declared an “undesirable organisation” in Russia. Kupriyanov did not admit guilt—he explained that this is a second-hand book and that two copies had been brought into the shop. Falanster, he stressed, was not involved in the activities of said anarchist organisation and did not communicate with its representatives.

    Additionally, in February, Falanster cancelled a presentation of a book about anti-fascism after denunciations from pro-government activists, and in March, prosecutors visited the shop for an inspection and seized several books, including works by Michel Foucault, Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin, and Susan Sontag.

    The date of the hearings has been corrected.

  • The Sverdlovsk Regional Court has overturned a fine of 40,000 rubles (about US$440) that was imposed in May on architect Polina Ivanova under the article on “discrediting the army” (part 1, article 20.3.3 of the Administrative Offences Code). This was reported by Mediazona.

    The media outlet 66.ru writes that the formal reason for overturning the fine is as follows: the case should have been considered not by the Leninsky District Court of Yekaterinburg, but by the Verkh-Isetsky District Court. Now the case will be re-examined in the Verkh-Isetsky court.

    Ivanova was detained for the protocol on 30 April. The reason was her anti-war post on Facebook, published in February 2022.

    Due to the detention, the architect had to cancel a lecture about the history of Yekaterinburg, a major city in the Urals, that was planned for the same day.

    Two weeks earlier, the Piotrovsky bookshop cancelled the launch of Ivanova’s book, “Guidebook to Sverdlovsk and Yekaterinburg.” This happened following a post by the pro-government channel UralLive, which was shared by the right-wing group Russian Community. The propagandists drew attention to the event announcement and began criticising Ivanova for her anti-war stance and for cooperating with the brother of Leonid Volkov.

10.06.2025

  • 17:52

    The Tagansky District Court in Moscow has fined Apple six million roubles (approximately US$67,000) under two charges related to “LGBT propaganda” (part 3, article 6.21 of the Code of Administrative Offences). This was reported by “Ostorozhno, novosti.”

    The reasons for the charges remain unknown, as the company requested that the hearings be held behind closed doors, according to RIA Novosti. The company’s lawyer stated that “confidential data relating to the operation of services, ‘very sensitive’ internal communications within Apple, and official documents” would be mentioned during the session.

    In May, Apple was also given three more fines totalling 7.5 million roubles (approximately US$84,000) on similar charges.

  • 16:00

    The Izmailovsky District Court in Moscow has sentenced a man to three days' detention over an “A.C.A.B” tattoo on his neck. The court’s ruling was highlighted by the outlet 'Ostorozhno, novosti'.

    On 9 June, the court found Kuvonchbek Ruziboev guilty of displaying banned symbols (Part 1, Art. 20.3 of the Code of Administrative Offences).

    The ruling states that on the morning of 6 June, officers from Centre “E” stopped Ruziboev for a document check.

    “[Ruziboev] engaged in the public display of extremist symbols on the right side of his neck with an 'A.C.A.B.' inscription (from English: All Cops Are Bastards), which translates as ‘All police are bastards’ or ‘All police are scum,’ included in the official list of prohibited symbols,” states the court document.

    However, neither the phrase nor the abbreviation are included in the federal list of extremist materials.

    In court, the man admitted guilt and said he did not know the meaning of his tattoo—it was chosen by the tattoo artist. He also promised to have it removed.

    “After officers from the Centre for Combating Extremism explained the meaning of the tattoo, he decided to have it removed; however, he has not yet done so, nor has he covered the neck area, and continues to display the tattoo in public,” the court resolution says.

    Last spring, left-wing activist Alexei Shichkov was detained for ten days over a photo showing the numbers 1312, which stand for ACAB, drawn on a wall. At the time, the court ruled that the numbers 1312 incited hatred (Art. 20.3.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences).

09.06.2025

07.06.2025